| Spring 2006 |
|
INFOLETTER
|
 |
 |
 |
Partner's Perspective |
|
Plan Now for a Family-Friendly Takeover
By Dale A. Ruther, CPA, CIT
As every parent knows, there comes a time to "let go" - to step out of the
way and see what a child can do on his or her own. The same is true with a
closely held company. It's hard to imagine the company running - let alone
thriving - without its founder, owner and chief decision-maker. But that day
will come, and now is the time to prepare for it.
The Right Time
Some say that before you launch a business, you should think about an exit
strategy. While that is probably not a common practice, the point is clear -
getting out is as important as getting in. So when is the right time to start
thinking and talking about succession? Obviously, it's never too early. But
there are a few signs that it's getting too late:
Aging leadership - When the business leader reaches his or her
late 50s or early 60s, succession plans should already be in place. Sometimes
it's difficult to get leaders to face the succession issue, either because their
identities are so closely tied to the company or because succession reminds them
of their own mortality. But if you are the leader of a company, you know you
won't be there forever. Long before you retire, you must begin to develop
interests and a support network outside the company. You'll be glad you did.
Discontented children - If the next generation is frustrated
with an unclear succession plan, they'll leave for greener pastures. If they
feel that they're never going to get a chance to lead, they'll find another
opportunity to let their skills and talents shine. Don't wait until the next
generation of leaders is unhappy and unmotivated. Share plans for the future so
that everyone is aware of next steps.
Lack of modernization - If your company has become slack in
product or infrastructure, it's probably time for some new faces on the
leadership team. Lack of modernization leaves the door open to competitors and
can quickly undermine corporate value. Be sure you leave the company in prime
condition for your successors.
No Surprises, No Strife
A succession plan should meet both the company's needs and the family's
needs. Look for talent in the next generation. Be aware of strengths and
weaknesses. Pay attention to those who express interest and desire to stay
involved and grow with the company. Most important, give the next generation
chances to lead - and chances to fail.
When it's time to create a plan, seek guidance from professionals. Of course,
your CPA can play an important role in designing a plan that will protect both
your assets and the company's future. Plus, he or she can share wisdom gleaned
from other clients who have successfully implemented family succession plans. A
counselor or executive coach can also be invaluable in terms of working with the
emotional issues of "letting go" and moving on to the next phase of life. Put
together a team of experts to help you with an exit strategy that's painless and
practical.
Succession doesn't have to be a crisis. With rigorous planning, the
transition to the next generation can be seamless and easy for everyone
involved.
We would be glad to help you think through your company's succession plan.
Please call or email me at
dale@bobermarkey.com, or your partner/manager at the firm, if you would like
some assistance. BMF&C
Tips for Signing a Commercial
Lease
By Lori A. Sheets, CPA
For
many business owners, signing a commercial lease is something
they're glad they only have to do once every year or two. Owners
often feel overwhelmed by the complexity, details and language
of a commercial lease.
Following are a few guidelines to help you sign a lease with the most
favorable terms for your business. And of course, don't forget to review the
legal documents with your favorite attorney.
Don't fall in love with the place. If you're looking for new space (as
opposed to renewing an existing lease), keep your options open. You want to be
able to walk away from any deal that's not at least fair, if not to your
advantage. This is the first rule of any negotiation.
Make sure it's clear who's responsible for what. Get as much of this down in
writing as possible so there are no questions who's responsible for roof leaks,
furnace and air conditioner breakdowns, common area maintenance, etc.
With regard to property improvements, there can be tax benefits to tenants if
leasehold improvements are added to the lease payments.
Understand the price. Most commercial property is priced per square foot
(e.g., $18 per square foot). To get a total price, simply multiply the
square-foot price by the total square footage of the property. Make sure the
square footage being quoted is for usable inside square footage, not outside
square footage. You might even measure the space yourself.
Know what kind of lease you're signing. There are many different types of
commercial leases. With a full service lease, the landlord pays all expenses and
the tenant pays a fixed rent amount, while with a triple net lease, the tenant
pays for everything (including maintenance, utilities, taxes and insurance)
directly. There are many variations on these and other types of leases.
Negotiate as much flexibility as you can. Things like options in your lease
term, right of first refusal to lease additional space for growth, and
cost-of-living rent increases at various intervals are usually negotiable. Get
as many concessions from the landlord as you can.
Talk with prospective neighbors. This is the best way to get the inside scoop
on the general area and/or the property itself. Ask about safety issues,
traffic, the tenant mix and the landlord's responsiveness in handling other
tenants' problems and requests.
For assistance in negotiating a commercial lease, please call or email me at
loris@bobermarkey.com.
BMF&C
SOX and Private Companies:
What Is the Impact?
By Michael J. Moldvay, CPA,
Senior Manager and Danielle J. Kimmell, CPA, Senior Manager
|

Michael J. Moldvay

Danielle J. Kimmell |
In July, 2002, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), which brought
about the most sweeping changes and redesign of federal securities law since the
1930s. The Act was passed in response to the well-publicized corporate scandals
and accounting irregularities at Enron, Worldcom and others.
While the provisions of SOX apply only to public companies, many private
firms are considering the potential benefits of voluntarily complying with some
of the Act's provisions - especially those that relate to establishing sound
internal controls. CPA firms nationwide notice that more private clients are
asking them to come in and perform SOX-like procedures for them.
Some companies are adopting these measures to send a message to their
customers, vendors, creditors and others of increased financial transparency. In
addition, some private companies' directors also sit on the boards of public
companies and are suggesting that the private firms implement SOX-like internal
control structures.
Adequate Internal Controls
Starting this year, Section 404 of SOX holds executives legally responsible
for maintaining an "adequate internal control structure" and procedures for
financial reporting. Public companies' auditors must attest to management's
assessment of these controls and disclose any material weaknesses.
|
Impact of SOX on Going Public and Private
With the cost to comply with the provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley estimated
to range from $1 million to $3 million per company, there has been
speculation about whether SOX has resulted in fewer private companies going
public and more public companies going private.
A recent report titled, "Did Sarbanes-Oxley make being public
prohibitive?" (Rosenthal, Gleason and Madura) details a comprehensive
analysis of firms going private both before and after SOX. According to the
report, "the cost of being public" was the reason most cited by firms for
going private. This reason was cited more often during the period after the
passage of SOX than in the period before passage.
However, the study also suggests that going-private transactions after
SOX have been influenced by other factors, such as timing. In other words,
poor performance may have prompted going private while the shares were
priced cheaply. "Overall, our results do not unambiguously establish that
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has produced a negative incentive for firms to remain
public," the report concludes.
"Our tests can be interpreted as being consistent with the hypothesis
that the higher compliance costs resulting from the Act create more
incentives for the firms to go private," the report says. "However, they are
also consistent with the idea that some of these firms should no longer be
public for fundamental reasons." |
Proper documentation and testing of internal controls, therefore, is
one of the first SOX-like procedures that private companies should
consider. Essentially, internal controls are checks and balances that
help prevent fraud, limit financial losses and reduce errors or
oversights by employees.
The most basic internal control concept is one that's referred to as
"segregation of duties." It requires that different employees handle different
financial and accounting tasks, thus limiting the potential for loss due to
fraud or human error. Consider the following suggestions for segregating
financial duties and strengthening your internal controls:
- Sign your own checks. Anyone who gets their hands on a signature stamp can
use it to write and cash fraudulent checks. Before signing each check, review
the invoice, delivery receipt and purchase order.
- Keep an eye out for slowdowns in accounts receivable processing and
posting of customer payments. These may be indications of a fraud scheme known
as "lapping of receivables" in which an employee pockets customer payments
instead of depositing them.
- Talk to your bank about Positive Pay services. This is an account
reconciliation service that allows you to pay only those checks that are
authorized, and it's one of the best ways to combat check fraud.
- Have one person open the mail and list all the checks on the deposit slip
while another enters cash receipts in your financial records.
- Put someone who does not handle the checkbook or purchasing in charge of
payments to suppliers or vendors.
- Have your bank reconciliation done by someone who does not have access to
daily checkbook transactions.
- Take responsibility for approving all vendors yourself, and make sure
there are procedures in place for counting all goods received and checking all
orders to make sure they are accurate and of the quantity intended.
Companies serious about documenting and testing their internal control
procedures will hire an outside accounting firm to evaluate their system of
internal controls and support the certification and assertion requirements of
Sarbanes-Oxley. Such a review typically includes these steps:
- Documenting and assessing the effectiveness of the internal controls
environment.
- Identifying potential control gaps and making recommendations for
improvement.
- Documenting and tracking changes to key processes and controls.
- Coordinating these efforts in a timely and effective manner with external
auditors.
Limitations of Performing SOX-Like Procedures
While there can be concrete benefits to documentation and testing of internal
controls, not all provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley will be practical for private
companies. For example, if owners of private companies have to separate
accounting and tax preparation duties, this may add to their cost of services
without providing any benefit.
In the end, whether or not to perform SOX-like procedures comes down to cost
vs. benefits. Clearly, there can be some value to a 404 type of audit for a
private company, but the benefits must justify the additional cost.
Regardless of how many private firms voluntarily comply with some of the SOX
provisions, the attention Sarbanes-Oxley has focused on the importance of
internal controls can only help privately held companies. It's clear that
post-Sarbanes-Oxley, more owners and CFOs of private companies are sitting down
with their accounting professionals and learning about how to improve their
internal controls.
To discuss your company's internal controls or whether an audit of your
internal control systems is appropriate, please call or email either of us at
mikem@bobermarkey.com
or danielle@bobermarkey.com,
or your partner/manager contact at the firm. BMF&C
|
Sarbanes-Oxley: The Nuts and Bolts
The key provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are as follows:
- Requires CEOs and CFOs of public companies to certify that their
system of internal controls and auditing meets rigorous standards.
- Establishes the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).
- Prohibits audit firms from performing a variety of non-audit work for
their clients.
- Requires companies to establish independent audit committees.
- Requires that only outside board members of a firm may be on its audit
committee.
- Requires complete disclosure on non-balance sheet items.
- Forbids company loans to company executives.
- Extends protection for "whistleblowers." No company may discharge,
demote, suspend, threaten, harass or in any other manner discriminate
against an employee because of any lawful provision of information
about suspected fraud.
|
 |
In this feature of InfoLetter, each quarter we provide a profile of
one of our professionals who is available to work with our clients and
friends.
Richard C.
Fedorovich, CPA
Managing Partner |
Rick focuses on serving privately held middle market and high growth clients
in a variety of industries. He has extensive experience in working with
not-for-profits and closely and family held businesses on issues including
succession planning, merger and acquisition transactions, tax planning, employee
stock ownership plans, estate planning, and business valuations.
A 1974 graduate of The University of Akron, Rick was with KPMG Peat Marwick
from 1974 - 1980. He joined the firm in 1980, was elected a Partner in 1982, and
was elected Managing Partner in 1996.
Rick's record of community service is notably extensive and includes
positions as Chairman or President of the Akron General Medical Center Board,
the Greater Akron Chamber, Leadership Akron, Leadership Akron Alumni
Association, the Akron General Development Foundation, Visiting Nurse Service
and Hospice Development Foundation, United Way of Summit County campaign,
Metropolitan Akron Residential Services for the Developmentally Disabled, and
Archbishop Hoban High School. Rick has previously been awarded the Pillar Award
for outstanding community service, the Justin T. Rogers Spirit of Hospice Award,
and the Public Service Award, granted for statewide recognition by the Ohio
Society of CPAs, along with numerous other awards for recognition of community
service.
Rick is a frequent speaker on various business topics. He has also authored a
number of articles on topics which have appeared in Crain's Cleveland Business,
Plain Dealer, and Smart Business.
"Excellence in community service is a hallmark of Bober, Markey, Fedorovich &
Company. It is not enough for our professionals to do outstanding work for our
firm's clients; we have a responsibility to give back to our community and we
are committed to doing so." BMF&C
|
Plans are proceeding full speed ahead on our new headquarters in Fairlawn.
As announced earlier, BMF&C will be one of the prime tenants in a new office
park near the corner of Ridgewood and Cleveland-Massillon Roads, a move made
necessary as we continue to grow and expand our staff. Contractors broke
ground in mid-February, have completed grading and clearing the site, and
are beginning to dig the building's foundation. We expect the steel
framework to be completed by late spring, in keeping with our rapid
timetable for the entire project, which calls for us to move in during
November. Stay tuned for more updates and details on logistics and
information with our new address and phone numbers. |
|